Divorce Financial Analyst Software
We make software in this category, so we have a point of view. Use these questions on every vendor, including us.
Your analysis is what clients pay for, and it's only as good as the numbers under it. So judge divorce financial software first on how it handles inputs and assumptions, and only then on how good the charts look.
A well-built spreadsheet is flexible and fully yours. For a simple engagement it may be all you need. It starts to cost you when:
Can every line be traced to its statement? Is there one set of inputs, so every scenario draws on the same data? Can you see which statements are still missing before you start?
Two divisions can look equal before tax and be far apart after it. Check how the tool treats pre-tax accounts, embedded capital gains, filing status changes and the tax treatment of support under current law.
A pension's present value turns on its discount rate, mortality table and retirement date. A long-range projection turns on returns and inflation. You should be able to see and change each one, and it should appear on the report. Watch for any tool that hides these behind a single answer.
Can you branch a scenario, change one assumption, and compare the results side by side, without losing the earlier version?
Try your harder cases: coverture fractions, defined-benefit pensions, RSUs and stock options, business interests and deferred compensation.
Reports should show their assumptions and be readable by a client, and by an attorney who may have to defend them. Check that they export in formats others can use.
Take a finished engagement where you trust your numbers, and rebuild it from the original statements. Any difference tells you something: either the tool handles something differently, or you've found something worth knowing. Check both pre-tax and after-tax results, and try one late change to see how much breaks.
Software should run the math. Choosing the assumptions and forming the opinion stay with you, which matters all the more if you may be asked to explain your work. Whatever you choose, make sure you could explain any figure without the tool in front of you.
Not necessarily. They're fine for simple work. Consider dedicated software when versions multiply, or when others need to check or rely on your numbers.
Inputs that trace back to statements, assumptions you can see and change, and after-tax comparisons across scenarios.
Rebuild a finished engagement from the original statements, and compare the results with work you already trust.